After a thorough audit spanning several years, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has demanded that Microsoft pay a hefty $28.9 billion in additional tax, along with interest and penalties. This amount covers the period from 2004 to 2013.
Naturally, Microsoft has no intention of simply accepting this decision. The company plans to challenge the findings.
The figure of $28.9 billion is truly staggering—it exceeds NASA's annual budget. However, it is unlikely that Microsoft will be cutting a check of this magnitude to the government anytime soon. Investors have shown minimal concern, as the stock price experienced only a slight drop of 0.6% during late trading on Wednesday.
In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and an accompanying blog post, Microsoft (ticker: MSFT) revealed the IRS's request. The IRS issued "Notices of Proposed Adjustment" for the ten-year period, seeking additional tax related to "intercompany transfer pricing."
Disagreeing with the proposed adjustments, Microsoft stated in the filing that it will vigorously contest the IRS's request through administrative appeals and, if necessary, in court. However, the company also acknowledged that resolving this matter will likely take several years.
It's clear that Microsoft will not back down easily. The battle between the tech giant and the taxman has only just begun.
Microsoft's Tax Dispute with the IRS
Microsoft has been collaborating with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for nearly a decade to address income and expense allocation during the period from 2004 to the present. The tech giant acknowledges that it has made significant changes to its corporate structure and practices since the years covered by the audit. As a result, the issues raised by the IRS are no longer applicable to Microsoft's current operations.
According to Daniel Goff, the Corporate Vice President of Worldwide Tax and Customs at Microsoft, the company firmly believes that it has always complied with the IRS's rules and has paid its taxes in full in the United States and worldwide. In fact, Microsoft has consistently been one of the top corporate income taxpayers in the U.S., having paid over $67 billion in taxes since 2004.
The main point of contention in the tax dispute lies in Microsoft's allocation of profits among various countries and jurisdictions during the specified period. Goff explains that this practice, known as transfer pricing, is commonly used by large multinational corporations to reflect the global nature of their operations. The IRS allows companies to utilize a specific transfer pricing arrangement called cost-sharing, which Microsoft has employed.
Under these IRS regulations, Microsoft's subsidiaries, which have shared in the costs of developing certain intellectual property, are entitled to a portion of the associated profits. This approach ensures fairness and aligns with the global nature of business operations.
In conclusion, Microsoft remains confident that it has adhered to all tax regulations and fulfilled its tax obligations both in the U.S. and globally. The company's commitment to transparency and ethical business practices continues to be at the forefront of its operations.
A Pledge to Resolve the Issue with IRS
According to recent updates, Goff, a prominent figure, has expressed their commitment to working closely with the IRS in order to find a mutual resolution to the ongoing issue. While the details of the matter remain undisclosed, Goff's dedication to resolving it over the forthcoming years is evident.
Our Latest News
Apple Shares Surge as Analyst Urges Caution for Short Sellers
Apple shares experience significant surge after analyst warns short sellers to exercise caution with strong iPhone 15 demand. Potential supply issues indicated.
Harland & Wolff Awarded £61 Million Contract for Vessel Refurbishment
Harland & Wolff Group Holdings secures a £61 million contract for vessel refurbishment from Cenovus Energy, with projected revenue figures of £100 million and £...
TAG Immobilien Reports Net Loss in Second Quarter
TAG Immobilien reports a net loss of 329.8 million euros in Q2 due to devaluation of its German real-estate portfolio caused by increased interest rates.